Skip to main content

State v. Worley

Citations

  • 297 N.W.2d 368
  • 1980 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant should not “suffer the sanction of rule [2.24(3)(a)] unless the court has complied with rule 3 of 42 4 [2.8(2)(d
  • holding defendant should not “suffer the sanction of rule [2.24(3)(a)] unless the court has complied with rule 4 [2.8(2)(d
  • “No defendant, however, should suffer the sanction of rule [2.24(3)(a)] unless the court has complied with rule [2.8(2)(d
  • “Where the trial court informs the defendant of this procedural requirement, we will not hesitate to preclude challenges to plea proceedings on appeal.”
  • “No defendant, however, should suffer the sanction of rule [2.24(3)(a)] unless the court has complied with rule [2.8(2)(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Legrand, Uhlenhopp, McGiverin, Schultz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.