State v. Meron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that failure to advise a defendant of the necessity to file a motion in arrest of judgment relieves a defendant of the consequence of not filing the motion
• finding failure to discuss witnesses or self-incrimination was not substantial compliance and holding “[t]he record must confirm the existence of substantial compliance in listing each right.”
• noting court's failure to inform the defendant entering guilty plea of those two pieces of information as required by rule 2.8(2)( d ) excuses the defendant's failure to challenge the guilty plea proceedings by filing a motion in arrest of judgment
• “Generally, a defendant must file a motion in arrest of judgment to preserve a challenge to a guilty plea on appeal.”
• “Generally, a defendant must file a motion in arrest of judgment to preserve a challenge to a guilty plea on appeal.”
• “Generally, a defendant must file a motion in arrest of judgment to preserve a challenge to a guilty plea on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).