State v. Word
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 265
Syllabus
Appellate Rule 26(B), application to reopen, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, defective indictment, allied offenses, merger, and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Applicant argues that the his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the indictments were defective in that they charged allied offenses because the named victim and the John Doe in a subsequent charge had to be the same person. Appellate counsel was not ineffective because he argued this point in an assignment of error and because the applicant's plea of guilty waived any defect in the indictment.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 116×
- State v. SzidnikOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 11×
- State v. TateOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.