State v. Woods
Citations
- 235 N.E.3d 1133
- 2024 Ohio 467
Syllabus
Joinder Crim.R. 8(A) photographs authentication Evid.R. 901(A) motion to suppress voir dire challenge for cause impeachment expert testimony personal knowledge Daubert Evid.R. 702 Evid.R. 703 ballistics evidence sufficiency manifest weight aggravated murder murder felonious assault criminal damaging carrying a concealed weapon ineffective assistance of counsel age as a sentencing factor. Trial court acted within its discretion in joining two cases arising from two separate incidents where the offenses were committed at different locations on different dates and were, therefore, simple and direct. Photographs from crime scene were properly authenticated by an officer who supervised the investigation. Motion to suppress was properly denied where there was no evidence that the search warrant affidavit contained untruthful statements. Denial of motion to excuse juror for cause due to anti-gun sentiments was not an abuse of discretion where the juror stated that she could keep an open mind, would hold the government to its burden of proof, and would listen to the evidence objectively. Trial court acted within its discretion in limiting the scope of cross-examination where defense counsel repeatedly asked objectionable questions and ultimately admitted at side bar that there was no evidence the witness had been reprimanded for dishonesty. Ballistics expert was qualified to testify regarding ballistics testing even though he did not perform the testing himself because he reviewed the examiner's work and had personal knowledge of the testing. Trial court properly admitted ballistic evidence indicating that shell casings found at multiple crime scenes were discharged from the same gun where the methodology used for the ballistics testing had been accepted by multiple courts as meeting the standards outlined in Daubert for admission of scientific evidence. There was sufficient evidence to support defendant's felonious assault and criminal damaging convictions where surveillan
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-14· cited 2×
- State v. Carter-ElOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-23· cited 2×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-29· cited 1×
- State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-24· cited 1×
- State v. GainesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-04
- State v. BachtelOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-24
Cites
79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 1,930×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 987×
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-11-22· cited 957×
- State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court· 1992-04-15· cited 801×
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-26· cited 801×
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 679×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. SchaimOhio Supreme Court· 1992-10-28· cited 617×
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 600×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.