Skip to main content

State v. Woodfork

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2786

Syllabus

CRIMINAL-RIGHT TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE-INFERIOR DEGREE OFFENSE-LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE-BATSON CHALLENGE-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Trial court's denial of motion for continuance did not deny the appellant his right to counsel of choice; the appellant was not entitled to inferior degree offense and lesser included offense jury instructions; the trial court committed no error in allowing the State's peremptory challenge where no Batson violation occurred; the appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.