Skip to main content

State v. Wood

Citations

  • 91 S.W.3d 769
  • 2002 Tenn. App. LEXIS 330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Davidson County Criminal Court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal of contempt charges from a general sessions court because such proceedings are not “fully -4- criminal”
  • recognizing that criminal contempt is not initiated by an indictment or presentment
  • holding that criminal contempt need not be initiated by indictment or presentment
  • stating that the sentence imposed for contempt “must ‘be the least severe measure necessary to achieve the purpose for which the sentence is imposed’”
  • percentage-of-service provisions of Sentencing Act did not apply in to criminal contempt sentence arising from underlying civil case
  • “[Criminal contempt] is enough of a crime that the double jeopardy provisions of the state and federal constitutions prohibit a subsequent contempt prosecution after a contempt proceeding starts and comes to an inconclusive end in another court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantrell, Koch, Cain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.