Skip to main content
· 10/15/1999

Dishmon v. Shelby State Community College

Citations

  • 15 S.W.3d 477
  • 1999 Tenn. App. LEXIS 685
  • 1999 WL 825035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subject matter jurisdiction “does not depend on the conduct or agreement of the parties, and thus the parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction on a trial or an appellate court by appearance, plea, consent, silence, or waiver”
  • “[T]he parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction on a trial or an appellate court by appearance, plea, consent, silence, or waiver.”
  • “Parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction on a trial or an appellate court by appearance, plea, consent, silence, or waiver.”
  • “Judgments or orders entered by courts without subject matter jurisdiction are void . . . .”
  • “Among the issues most commonly considered by appellate courts on their own motion is the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction.”
  • “[W]hen an appellate court determines that a trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, it must vacate the judgment and dismiss the case without reaching the merits of the appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Lewis, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.