Skip to main content

State v. Winkle

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1365

Syllabus

ABUSE OF DISCRETION – DEDUCTIBLE – ECONOMIC LOSS – INSURANCE – RESTITUTION – VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT: Because the victim impact statement contains competent, credible evidence from which the trial court could determine that victim-appellant suffered an economic loss by paying an insurance deductible and therefore could be entitled to restitution in the amount of the insurance deductible, the cause must be remanded for the trial court to hold a restitution hearing.

Judges: Nestor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.