State v. Wilson

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 8498

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant, in 1997, was convicted of rape of a person under thirteen years of age. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Defendant-appellant, since then, has filed numerous motions and actions seeking further review of his conviction and sentence with none of these collateral attacks being successful. The issues raised by Defendant-appellant's current motion are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Further, the trial court appropriately overruled Defendant-appellant's motion for Grand Jury testimony. Judgment affirmed.