Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/26/2017
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 5484
Syllabus
The trial court did nor err in finding that the property description in the warrant was sufficient. The trial court did not err by denying the motion to exclude oral evidence because the applicable rule does not require the transcription of oral testimony prior to the execution of the warrant
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2,064×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 727×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-06· cited 26×
- State v. FieldingOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-15· cited 24×
- Tyler v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1882-01-19· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.