Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/2/2011

State v. Wilson

Citations

248 P.3d 10
240 Or. App. 475
2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing where the trial court made a legal error in finding the defendant guilty, despite the fact that there was “sufficient evidence from which the trial court could have found” that the defendant was guilty
reversing where the trial court made a legal error in finding the defendant guilty despite the fact that there was “sufficient evidence from which the trial court could have found” that the defendant was guilty (emphasis in original)
defendant properly preserved contention that trial court “convicted him on a theory of culpability that is legally erroneous”
“[Accomplice liability under ORS 161.155(2)(b) cannot be based on ‘aiding and abetting after the fact.’”
“[W]e reverse [the] defendant’s conviction for second-degree theft and remand for a new trial.”
defendant’s appellate argument was preserved when, in colloquy during closing argument in a bench trial, “the trial court advanced—and defense counsel patently disputed—” the same theory of liability on which the court ultimately predicated its determination of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.