Skip to main content

State v. Olive

Citations

  • 259 Or. App. 104
  • 312 P.3d 588
  • 2013 WL 5743818
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 1257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • overruling 1984 decision construing ORS 162.315 (defining crime of resisting arrest), reasoning that our precedent, which antedated PGE, “did not adequately analyze” the statute
  • explaining when stare decisis must give way in a case involving the interpretation of a statute
  • applying “plainly wrong” standard with respect to court’s precedent construing statute
  • reviewing legislative history of ORS 162.315 and concluding that, “[t]o form the intent to resist another per- son in making an arrest, a person must know that an arrest is taking place”
  • reviewing legislative history of ORS 162.315 and concluding that, “[t] o form the intent to resist another person in making an arrest, a person must know that an arrest is taking place”
  • reviewing legislative history of ORS 162.315 and concluding that, “[t]o form the intent to resist another per- son in making an arrest, a person must know that an arrest is taking place”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Brewer, Duncan, Kantor, Tempore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.