State v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that defendant conceded that analysis of constitutionality of warrantless search of vehicle was ‘‘the same under either our state or federal constitu- tion’’
• declining to decide whether defen- dant’s prosecutorial impropriety claim was waived because prosecutor’s remark was not improper
• possession of salable quantities of narcotics on defendant’s person upon leaving vehicle gave police probable cause to believe vehicle contained additional contraband
• we “engage in a plenary review of the court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress”
• we \engage in a plenary review of the court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 62×
• State v. Winfrey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-23· cited 32×
• State v. Diaz
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-04-09· cited 17×
• State v. Payne
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-25· cited 13×
• State v. Pires
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-07-27· cited 7×
• State v. Langley
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-04-26· cited 6×
• State v. DeMarco
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-10-12· cited 5×
• State v. Ortiz
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-06-12· cited 3×
• State v. Bouvier
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-12-07· cited 3×
• State v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-02-25· cited 1×
• State v. Colon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-08-05· cited 1×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-04-29
• Stratford v. Wilson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-06-17
• Wilson v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-06