Tennessee Supreme Court· 9/18/2000

State v. Wilson

Citations

31 S.W.3d 189
2000 Tenn. LEXIS 519
2000 WL 1336633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “the proper forum for asserting that a plea was not -5- knowingly or voluntarily entered in accordance with Boykin is in a post-conviction proceeding”
noting that “whether a defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered a guilty plea will rarely, if ever, be apparent from a record of the ‘proceedings already had . . . .’” (citing Tenn. R. Crim. P. 37(b)(2)(iii); T.R.A.P. 3(b)(2))
due process clause of United States Constitution requires that guilty pleas be knowing and voluntary
“[T]he proper forum for asserting that a plea was not knowingly or voluntarily entered . . . is in a post-conviction proceeding.”
pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 37(b), defendant’s “claim that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered” is not appealable as of right
due process requires that guilty pleas be knowing and voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Anderson, Drowota, Holder, Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

140 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.