Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 8/23/1995

State v. Brooks

Citations

909 S.W.2d 854
1995 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant’s intentional misrepresentation of his identity to police officers is sufficient to establish criminal impersonation
concluding that to establish the offense of criminal impersonation, the State need show only that the accused intended to misrepresent his true identity to the arresting officer
noting that the only difference between theft of a vehicle and unauthorized use of a vehicle is the defendant’s intent
holding failure to charge lesser-included offenses is subject to plain error review
joyriding is a lesser-included offense of theft as the sole variation between the offenses is the offender's intent
affirming conviction despite voluntary intoxication in part because the defendant “did not appear to have difficulty answering questions and there was nothing about his condition that indicated he was intoxicated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tipton, Jones, Peay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.