State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he record does not contain evidence that would allow a nonspeculative inference that something of significance occurred between the defendant's sequential acts of touching.\ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Loving
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 6×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 25×
• State v. Dugan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14· cited 8×
• State v. Avila
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 6×