State v. Dugan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that two guilty verdicts for sexual abuse, based on touching two of the victim's body parts in a single incident, should have merged into a single conviction
• merger was required where record demonstrated “only that defendant’s acts occurred in sequence over a brief period of time, between 10 and 15 minutes, in a confined space, the victim’s entryway, without interruption by any ‘significant’ event, and without a pause in defendant’s aggression”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Zachery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-03· cited 5×
• State v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-10-28· cited 5×
• State v. Moscote-Saavedra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-07-13· cited 3×
• State v. Perez-Cardenas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 2×
• State v. Mankiller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-22· cited 2×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-01· cited 1×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Huffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-03· cited 33×
• State v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-30· cited 25×
• State v. West-Howell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-23· cited 19×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20· cited 10×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 7×