Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 276 Or. App. 688
  • 368 P.3d 459
  • 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider issue on remand where Supreme Court had spe- cifically instructed Court of Appeals to consider a different issue
  • curative instruction was sufficient to mitigate jury’s view of video- taped interview in which detective repeatedly stated that he could “read body language” and that defendant’s body movements indicated he was lying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Duncan, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.