Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 9/15/2015

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 776 S.E.2d 741
  • 243 N.C. App. 198
  • 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 770
  • 2015 WL 5331965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the State's use of the phrase \absconding supervision\ to describe the defendant's actions \cannot convert violations of N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 15A-1343(b)(2) and (3) into a violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1343(b)(3a)\
  • “Although the report alleged that Defendant's actions constituted ‘abscond[ing] supervision,’ this wording cannot convert violations of [N.C.G.S.] §§ 15A-1343(b)(2) and (3) into a violation of [N.C.G.S.] § 15A-1343(b)(3a).”
  • “Although the report alleged that Defendant's actions constituted ‘abscond[ing] supervision,’ this wording cannot convert violations of [N.C.G.S.] §§ 15A-1343(b)(2) and (3) into a violation of [N.C.G.S.] § 15A-1343(b)(3a).”
  • “Although the report alleged that Defendant's actions constituted ‘abscond[ing] supervision,’ this wording cannot convert violations of [N.C.G.S.] §§ 15A-1343(b)(2) and (3) into a violation of [N.C.G.S.] § 15A-1343(b)(3a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.