Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2/20/2018

State v. Krider

Citations

810 S.E.2d 828
258 N.C. App. 111

Syllabus

Probation Probation revocation Absconding N.C. Gen. Stat. Section 15A-1343(b)(3a) N.C. Gen. Stat. Section 15A-1344(f) Jurisdiction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reasoning that the State’s allegations and supporting evidence were very similar to those rejected in Williams because defendant’s actions only amounted to a violation of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1343(b)(3) and did not rise to the distinct violation of absconding supervision
reasoning that the State’s allegations and supporting evidence were very similar to those rejected in Williams because defendant’s actions only amounted to a violation of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1343(b)(3) and did not rise to the distinct violation of absconding supervision
reasoning that the State’s allegations and supporting evidence were very similar to those rejected in Williams because defendant’s actions only amounted to a violation of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1343(b)(3) and did not rise to the distinct violation of absconding supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabria, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Krider

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.