Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/21/2021

State v. Williams

Citations

2021 Ohio 3317

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by admitting cellphone recordings of the surveillance video footage into evidence, as cellphone recordings were duplicate recordings under Evid.R. 1003. Appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgement affirmed.

Judges: Sadler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Maurer
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
State v. Issa
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 787×
State v. Tibbetts
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 477×
State v. Albert
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-27· cited 28×
State v. Taylor
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 15×
State v. Morris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-27· cited 14×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.