State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s assertion that the use of leading questions violated the rules of evidence to such an extent that defendant was denied his right to a fair trial was not preserved for appeal without contemporaneous objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dixon
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 131×
• Browder v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 85×
• State v. Mustafa Abdulla Abu-Isba
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-07-13· cited 54×
• State v. McCray
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-04· cited 40×
• State v. McKessor
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-01-19· cited 34×
• State v. Amado
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-08-06· cited 12×
• City of Overland Park v. Estell
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1982-11-12· cited 10×
• People v. Kessler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-03-21· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Wertheimer
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-12-13· cited 4×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-09-26· cited 3×
• State v. Powell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 2×