Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/14/1974
State v. Williams
Citations
- 210 S.E.2d 298
- 263 S.C. 290
- 1974 S.C. LEXIS 241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing “considerable latitude and discretion should be allowed the trial [court] in determining the admissibility of impeaching testimony”
- holding indictment based upon hearsay testimony does not violate defendants rights
- in view of difficulty in determining what are collateral matters, considerable latitude and discretion should be allowed trial judge in determining admissibility of testimony impeaching witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Moss, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
- Robert Williams v. J. R. Martin, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of South CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1980-03-06· cited 81×
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 72×
- State v. CutroSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-08-15· cited 43×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 34×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 31×
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-04· cited 28×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-21· cited 22×
- State v. ConyersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-03-01· cited 19×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 18×
- State v. BarrosoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-06-12· cited 16×
- State v. RidgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-22· cited 13×
- State v. CappsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-24· cited 12×
- State v. DegnanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-08-12· cited 12×
- State v. HardySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-01-14· cited 10×
- State v. MizellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-07-20· cited 10×
- In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-06-26· cited 8×
- State v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-03-19· cited 6×
- State v. LathamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-07· cited 5×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-07-23· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1956-04-01· cited 1,814×
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 586×
- Margolis v. TelechSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-11-07· cited 23×
- McCrary v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-01-04· cited 16×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-12-17· cited 9×
- State v. ChilesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1895-07-05· cited 7×
- Moorer v. THE STATE OF SCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-03-30· cited 3×
- Miller v. South CarolinaD. South Carolina· 1970-02-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.