Arizona Supreme Court· 4/10/1975

State v. Williams

Citations

533 P.2d 1146
111 Ariz. 511
1975 Ariz. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The fact that one woman was raped is not substantial evidence that another did not consent.” (citing Lovely v. United States, 169 F.2d 386, 390 (4th Cir.1948))
“ ‘objective of cross-examination of a character witness for an accused is to show an inadequate basis for the reputation to which the witness has testified on direct’ ”
criminal appeal reviewing admissibility of evidence
criminal appeal reviewing admissibility of evidence
civil appeal apply- ing doctrine of fundamental error
civil appeal applying doctrine of fun- damental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.