State v. Williams
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1457
Syllabus
Drug trafficking and possession; dominion and control; knowledge; substance; constructive possession; hearsay; bench trial. - Appellant's convictions for drug possession and trafficking were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. A conviction for drug possession may rest on constructive possession, so long as knowledge of the substances and dominion or control over the premises where the substances are found can be inferred from the evidence presented. Even if hearsay evidence was improperly elicited in a bench trial, we presume that the trial court was capable of distinguishing and disregarding such hearsay unless there is affirmative evidence in the record to the contrary.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,102×
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,059×
- State v. HankersonOhio Supreme Court· 1982-05-19· cited 556×
- State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-02· cited 520×
- State v. CassanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-06· cited 129×
- State v. RodanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 61×
- State v. CrenshawOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-15· cited 28×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 26×
- State v. CottinghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-27· cited 17×
- State v. BlalockOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.