State v. Williams
Citations
- 2025 ND 46
Syllabus
A Brady violation is established when the defendant proves the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant, the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence, the prosecution suppressed the evidence, and a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed. To prevail on a Brady claim a defendant must satisfy all four prongs or factors of the legal test. When an issue is not raised at the trial court, this Court will not address the issue on appeal unless the alleged error rises to the level of obvious error. A defendant's due process rights may be violated by a prosecutor's actions that constitute misconduct that has a prejudicial effect.
Judges: Crothers, Daniel John
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-02-12· cited 26×
- State v. Pena GarciaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-01-12· cited 20×
- State v. MuhleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-08-22· cited 17×
- State v. ChatmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-12-22· cited 14×
- State v. PedersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-05-02· cited 10×
- State v. LymanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-08-18· cited 7×
- State v. KolstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 6×
- State v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-03-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.