Skip to main content

State v. King

Citations

  • 2025 ND 174

Syllabus

Obvious error analysis requires consideration whether the district court clearly deviated from applicable current law. An alleged error that is not plain will not be analyzed further in accordance with judicial restraint and constitutional avoidance.

Judges: Crothers, Daniel John

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.