North Dakota Supreme Court· 1/28/2020

State v. Wickham

Citations

2020 ND 25

Syllabus

The district court did not obviously err by admitting fact testimony and by not stopping a witness from testifying by way of a mix of permissible lay opinion testimony and arguably impermissible expert opinion testimony.

Judges: Crothers, Daniel John

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Wickham
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-01-28· cited 6×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering
Third Circuit· 1995-06-20· cited 160×
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Thomas C. Sinkovich
Fourth Circuit· 2000-11-02· cited 90×
City of Fargo v. Erickson
North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 42×
State v. Tresenriter
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-11-27· cited 33×
State v. Glass
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-12-12· cited 32×
State v. Pemberton
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 30×
State v. Patterson
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-10-28· cited 28×
State v. Engel
North Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-02-14· cited 27×
State v. Lott
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-15· cited 17×
State v. Evans
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-10-30· cited 15×
State v. Saulter
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 13×
State v. Wangstad
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-09-25· cited 12×
State v. Crissler
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-10-17· cited 9×
State v. Louser
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-01-27· cited 7×
State v. Foster
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-15· cited 7×
State v. Wickham
North Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-01-28· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.