Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/3/2007
State v. Whitten
Citations
- 375 S.C. 43
- 649 S.E.2d 505
- 2007 S.C. App. LEXIS 161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an appellate court is limited by appellate rules that allow the court to consider only the precise question that was before the trial court and ruled upon by the court
- holding an appellate court is limited by appellate rules that allow the court to consider only the precise question that was before the trial court and ruled upon by the court
- finding an appellate court is limited by appellate rules that allow the court to consider only the precise question that was before the trial judge and ruled upon by him or her
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Hearn, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 229×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-13· cited 177×
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 94×
- McKissick v. J.F. Cleckley & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 63×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-15· cited 47×
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 26×
- Magazine v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 11×
- Bellamy v. PayneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.