Montana Supreme Court· 11/25/1997
State v. Whitlow
Citations
- 949 P.2d 239
- 285 Mont. 430
- 54 State Rptr. 1227
- 1997 Mont. LEXIS 254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court ruling on motion for new trial based upon prosecutorial misconduct reviewed for abuse of discretion
- defendant’s prior conviction for sexual assault against daughter [touching daughter’s breasts and genitals and attempting sexual penetration] was sufficiently similar to charge of sexual intercourse without consent where defendant penetrated different victim’s genitals
- defendant's prior conviction for sexual assault against daughter [touching daughter's breasts and genitals and attempting sexual penetration] was sufficiently similar to charge of sexual intercourse without consent where defendant penetrated different victim's genitals
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nelson, Gray, Leaphart, Hunt, Regnier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2008-04-22· cited 288×
- State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court· 2005-12-28· cited 76×
- State v. BuckMontana Supreme Court· 2006-04-25· cited 63×
- State v. Blain SouthernMontana Supreme Court· 1999-05-11· cited 56×
- State v. McWilliamsMontana Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 53×
- State v. StewartMontana Supreme Court· 2012-12-27· cited 53×
- State v. District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District of MontanaMontana Supreme Court· 2010-12-14· cited 52×
- State v. AakreMontana Supreme Court· 2002-05-10· cited 47×
- State v. AyersMontana Supreme Court· 2003-04-28· cited 45×
- State v. DunfeeMontana Supreme Court· 2005-06-08· cited 45×
- State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court· 2005-05-17· cited 41×
- State v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court· 2013-04-10· cited 32×
- State v. MaierMontana Supreme Court· 1999-03-18· cited 27×
- State v. GardnerMontana Supreme Court· 2003-12-11· cited 27×
- State v. ReichmandMontana Supreme Court· 2010-10-27· cited 26×
- State v. ElliottMontana Supreme Court· 2002-02-21· cited 23×
- State v. SweeneyMontana Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 20×
- State v. PaoniMontana Supreme Court· 2006-02-07· cited 20×
- State v. WhitlowMontana Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 18×
- Mayhew v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-04-09· cited 18×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- State v. JustMontana Supreme Court· 1979-10-22· cited 262×
- United States v. Edward L. Morris and Steven M. GardnerSeventh Circuit· 1996-05-01· cited 146×
- State v. MattMontana Supreme Court· 1991-06-26· cited 145×
- State v. ArlingtonMontana Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 115×
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carlos Jones, Also Known as Dion Tillman, Appellant/cross-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1994-10-19· cited 68×
- State v. GreenoMontana Supreme Court· 1959-07-21· cited 57×
- State v. EilerMontana Supreme Court· 1988-09-14· cited 48×
- State v. TeccaMontana Supreme Court· 1986-02-11· cited 46×
- State v. SteffesMontana Supreme Court· 1994-12-21· cited 41×
- State v. NicholsMontana Supreme Court· 1987-03-04· cited 34×
- State v. ScheffelmanMontana Supreme Court· 1991-11-18· cited 34×
- State v. DollMontana Supreme Court· 1985-01-03· cited 30×
- State v. HendersonMontana Supreme Court· 1994-07-07· cited 30×
- State v. WeldyMontana Supreme Court· 1995-08-04· cited 30×
- Kizer v. Semitool, Inc.Montana Supreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 29×
- State v. CroteauMontana Supreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 28×
- State v. KeysMontana Supreme Court· 1993-05-18· cited 28×
- State v. MedinaMontana Supreme Court· 1990-09-25· cited 27×
- State v. BrooksMontana Supreme Court· 1993-08-24· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.