State v. Arlington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a witness’s contemplated civil lawsuit is relevant evidence admissible to show that witness may have motive to testify falsely
• adopting majority view that cross-examination as to contemplated civil lawsuits against the defendant is allowed on cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).