State v. Whitesell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the legislature specifically intended to foreclose review of an increase in probation term pursuant to K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4611(c)(5) by inserting the “not subject to appeal” language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. McIntyre
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-05-24· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• State v. Gould
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-05-25· cited 213×
• State v. Puckett
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-02-27· cited 104×
• State v. Whitesell
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 104×
• State v. Neer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 74×
• State v. Gibbons
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-02-03· cited 38×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-03-03· cited 19×
• State v. Creamer
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-01-21· cited 15×
• Miller v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1968-03-09· cited 14×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-07-31· cited 13×
• State v. Bowie
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 10×
• State v. Schick
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-12-04· cited 10×
• State v. Stuber
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 8×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 5×