Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 8/6/2014
State v. White
Citations
- 410 S.C. 56
- 762 S.E.2d 726
- 2014 WL 3844247
- 2014 S.C. App. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- merger clause does not bar claims arising from misrepresentations contained in the contract upon which plaintiff relied
- \[A]ny error in the failure to suppress a statement allegedly taken in violation of Miranda is subject to a harmless error analysis.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Few, Geathers, Short
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 91×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-19· cited 59×
- State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-31· cited 27×
- State v. NavySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-11· cited 23×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-20· cited 19×
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 17×
- State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 13×
- State v. SilverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-03-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.