State v. White
Citations
- 215 Conn. App. 273
Syllabus
Convicted of the crime of assault in the first degree with a firearm as an accessory, the defendant appealed to this court. He claimed, inter alia, that the trial court's jury instructions improperly omitted an essential element of that offense, namely, the accessory's intent that the principal would use a firearm during the commission of the offense. The defendant had been dating A's sister, M. A suspected that the defendant had been beating M and drove with S to M's apartment building to check on her. The victim, G, drove to the apartment building separately and joined A and S inside the building. When the defendant arrived shortly thereafter, a physical altercation ensued between A and the defendant during which a gun fell out of the defendant's pocket. G, S and A then fled the building and entered G's car while the defendant ran to a parking lot across the street and conferred with another man. The defendant and the other man, who was armed with a gun, then ran to G's car, which G was unable to start, and, together, pulled on the handle of the driver's side door in an attempt to open the door and pull G out of the driver's seat. G attempted to flee when they were able to open the door but was shot by the defendant's acquaintance. At trial, the defendant contended that the court should instruct the jury on accessorial liability in accordance with the requirements for conspiratorial liability set forth in State v. Pond (315 Conn. 451), which held that a defendant must intend that every element of the planned offense be accomplished, even an element that itself carries no specific intent requirement. The trial court rejected the defendant's reliance on Pond and instead instructed the jury in accordance with State v. Gonzalez (300 Conn. 490) and State v. Artis (136 Conn. App. 568) that an accomplice may be held criminally liable for the principal's use of a weapon even when the accessory did not intend or even know that a weapon would be used to commit the crime. He
Judges: Bright; Cradle; Seeley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2014-03-05· cited 698×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-05-28· cited 131×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-12-20· cited 95×
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-09-07· cited 59×
- State v. T.R.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-25· cited 57×
- State v. TRDSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-03-25· cited 56×
- State v. CrosswellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 53×
- State v. AvilaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-12· cited 40×
- State v. McCalpineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-07-26· cited 31×
- State v. HeinemannSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-08· cited 28×
- State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-12· cited 25×
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-05-16· cited 23×
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-03-27· cited 20×
- State v. SolekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-12· cited 18×
- State v. WashingtonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-30· cited 16×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-04-05· cited 15×
- State of Missouri v. Pierre M. WardMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-11-10· cited 15×
- State v. TuckerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-11-18· cited 13×
- State v. HinesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-07· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.