Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/21/1993
State v. White
Citations
- 850 P.2d 1158
- 119 Or. App. 424
- 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 621
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “I object to this line of questioning” held not sufficient to preserve objection, because it failed to identify a particular rule or other source
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rossman, De Muniz Leeson, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court· 1946-09-18· cited 58×
- State v. GrenawaltCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-06-24· cited 12×
- State v. HalfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-05-23· cited 11×
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 10×
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 8×
- State v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-11-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.