Maney v. Angelozzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “medical expertise is required to relate the appellant’s present arthritis etiologieally to his post-service symptoms”
• holding that \medical expertise is required to relate the appellant's present arthritis etiologically to his post-service symptoms\
• holding that veteran’s retrospective assertion of continuous symptoms is competent evidence sufficient for this purpose
• holding that, per 38 C.F.R. § 3.303(b), medical evidence of nexus is not required for benefits if the veteran demonstrates continuity of symptoms between his present disability and service
• holding that, in certain circumstances, a relationship between a present disability and continuity of symptomatology since service may be demonstrated by lay statements because “such a relationship is one as to which a lay person’s observation is competent”
• requiring that a veteran present medical nexus evidence relating currently diagnosed arthritis to in-service back injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).