Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/10/1987
State v. Whitaker
Citations
- 202 Conn. 259
- 520 A.2d 1018
- 1987 Conn. LEXIS 758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing in context of then Practice Book §§ 756 through 768 [now §§ 40-17 through 40-25], which address, inter alia, defenses of mental disease or defect and alibi, that “some degree of mutual discovery is essential to the truth-seeking process”
- requiring defense disclosure of names and addresses of alibi witnesses, but not statements
- alibi provisions authorize disclosure of names and addresses of alibi witnesses, but do not mention statements of alibi witnesses, which are therefore not disclosable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dannehy, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
- State v. KalakoskyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 133×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 108×
- Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-20· cited 97×
- State v. HaffordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-07· cited 89×
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court· 1988-12-15· cited 65×
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-12· cited 58×
- State v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-04· cited 53×
- State v. HoeplingerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-16· cited 44×
- State v. RichardsondSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-04· cited 20×
- State v. WesterfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-08-06· cited 19×
- Papa v. PapaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-09-21· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-01· cited 15×
- State v. SpillaneConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-07-13· cited 12×
- Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-02· cited 11×
- State v. SianoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-12-19· cited 8×
- State v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-15· cited 4×
- United States Ex Rel. Patosky v. KozakiewiczW.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-03-24
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1941-03-04· cited 172×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-04-20· cited 84×
- State v. PikulSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-12-04· cited 60×
- Brown v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-05-13· cited 54×
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-03· cited 52×
- State v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-09· cited 48×
- State v. LizotteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 47×
- State v. SandstromSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-05-05· cited 41×
- State v. PambianchiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-02-24· cited 41×
- State v. MontagueSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-03-02· cited 41×
- In re Robert H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-20· cited 39×
- State v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-30· cited 21×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-12-30· cited 19×
- Richardson v. District Court in & for the Eighth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-08-17· cited 15×
- Moore v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1970-04-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.