State v. Whisonant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “[a]n improper introduction of hearsay evidence constitutes reversible error only if its admission is prejudicial to the defendant”
• finding testimony containing detail exceeding the parameters of the rule constitutes hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lindsey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 29×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-28· cited 24×
• State v. Hendricks
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-04-23· cited 13×
• State v. Jeffcoat
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-06-17· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kelsey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 143×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-15· cited 141×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 40×
• Jolly v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
• State v. Burroughs
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-09-29· cited 27×
• Simpkins v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 26×
• State v. Hardee
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-10-19· cited 20×