State v. Hendricks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the admission of a hearsay statement did not prejudice the appellant because the corroboration the appellant contended was improperly achieved by the hearsay statement had already been properly accomplished by live testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cain
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-01-05· cited 8×
• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-08· cited 7×
• State v. Parvin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-07-30· cited 6×
• State v. Prather
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-09-06· cited 1×
• State v. Bowers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
• State v. Prather
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-03-11

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Weston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 263×
• State v. Jennings
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 122×
• State v. McHoney
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-19· cited 100×
• State v. Kromah
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-01-23· cited 94×
• United States v. Byron Mitchell
  Third Circuit· 1998-05-14· cited 89×
• Jolly v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-09· cited 37×
• State v. Ladner
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-04-23· cited 36×
• State v. Sims
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-01-14· cited 33×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-11-20· cited 23×
• State v. Washington
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-08-04· cited 19×
• State v. Brockmeyer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-11-27· cited 18×
• State v. Whisonant
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 6×