State v. Wheeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A] downward departure will be reversed where the record does not support a conclusion that there is a pressing need for restitution.\
• defendant did not cooperate with the State to resolve the current offense where “[a]t the time the police questioned him, they were already aware of his crimes”
• because the police were already aware of the defendant’s crimes at the time they questioned him, his cooperation at that time did not serve as a mitigating factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JACOB LACKEY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-01· cited 4×
• State v. Baron C. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-25· cited 1×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. SHERRY CROSSLEY-ROBINSON
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-05· cited 1×
• Joseph D. Henderson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Banks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-15· cited 258×
• De La Beckwith v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-12-22· cited 151×
• State v. Knox
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-12· cited 24×
• Demoss v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-27· cited 14×
• State v. Quintanal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-04· cited 9×
• State v. Naylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-26· cited 5×