Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 10/31/1995
State v. Westover
Citations
- 140 N.H. 375
- 666 A.2d 1344
- 1995 N.H. LEXIS 159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where there is no possibility of imprisonment “the defendant does not have a right to appointed counsel”
- majority opinion upholding that the defendant did not permanently abandon his sweatshirt when he gently tossed it on the ground before entering the convenience store and reversing the trial court’s determination that the sweatshirt was “temporarily abandoned”
- due process requires that child in truancy proceeding be afforded counsel
- abandonment determined from objective facts at hand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder, Brock, Horton, Johnson, Thayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-07-17· cited 36×
- State v. CelusniakNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-04-15· cited 33×
- Tesmer v. GranholmSixth Circuit· 2003-06-17· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. FahertyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-04-11· cited 25×
- State v. VealeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-05-01· cited 22×
- Frese v. FormellaFirst Circuit· 2022-11-08· cited 20×
- State v. D'AmourSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-10-10· cited 18×
- State v. PinkhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-07-16· cited 15×
- In re Richard A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-18· cited 14×
- State v. HoweSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-11-17· cited 12×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-21· cited 8×
- In Re Kotey M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-02-18· cited 6×
- Robert Frese v. Gordon J. MacDonald, In his official capacity only as Attorney General of the State of New HampshireD. New Hampshire· 2019-10-25· cited 1×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,488×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-12· cited 762×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq. Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1985-04-01· cited 124×
- United States v. Carless Jones and Eugene HarveyTenth Circuit· 1983-05-20· cited 120×
- United States v. Daniel ThomasD.C. Circuit· 1989-01-06· cited 96×
- United States v. Donel Eston Williams, Garry Allison Williams and Richard Dow WilliamsFifth Circuit· 1978-01-19· cited 58×
- Morton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-07· cited 51×
- State v. MayaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-05-28· cited 50×
- State v. TheodosopoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-17· cited 35×
- State v. SterndaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-03-23· cited 35×
- People v. Baraka H.California Court of Appeal· 1992-05-21· cited 28×
- State v. RoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-04-10· cited 22×
- O'SHAUGHNESSY v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-12· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-24· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.