State v. Veale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reputation alone is a sufficient interest to require state due process protection and rejecting the federal “stigma-plus” approach
• finding “ample support in our jurisprudence for the proposition that reputational stigma can, by itself, constitute a deprivation of liberty deserving due process” under the State Constitution
• to evaluate whether procedure afforded requisite safeguards, court considers, among other things, risk of erroneous deprivation of private interest through procedures used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).