State v. West

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2060

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of the State on its vexatious litigator complaint and by designating appellant a vexatious litigator, where the State satisfied its burden to establish that no genuine issue of material fact existed for trial. The trial court's summary judgment ruling was not premature and did not deny appellant his right to discovery. Appellant's claim that the vexatious litigator statute is unconstitutional also lacks merit, as it is well established that the statute is constitutional in its entirety. Judgment affirmed.