Skip to main content
· 3/14/2023

Truist Bank v. Eichenberger

Citations

  • 210 N.E.3d 982
  • 2023 Ohio 779

Syllabus

Breach of Contract-Summary Judgment-In breach of contract action arising out of a consumer's loan agreement with a bank, trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in the bank's favor. No genuine issues of material fact existed regarding the validity of the agreement or the creditor's failure to make required monthly payment, thus resulting in the breach. Dismissal of creditor's breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty counterclaims was proper, as neither were sufficiently pled. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Edelstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.