Skip to main content

State v. Wessels

Citations

  • 424 N.W.2d 572
  • 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 504
  • 1988 WL 52491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that defendant’s burden to establish the need for an in camera hearing “is somewhat lighter than the defendant’s ultimate burden of proving that disclosure of the informant’s identity is necessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: A. Paul Lommen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.