Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 5/31/1988
State v. Wessels
Citations
- 424 N.W.2d 572
- 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 504
- 1988 WL 52491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that defendant’s burden to establish the need for an in camera hearing “is somewhat lighter than the defendant’s ultimate burden of proving that disclosure of the informant’s identity is necessary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: A. Paul Lommen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-01-02· cited 179×
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-19· cited 133×
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-02-07· cited 117×
- Syrovatka v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-20· cited 31×
- State v. PurdySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-09-22· cited 30×
- State v. LuciowSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-03-26· cited 29×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-06· cited 26×
- State v. BrunesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-08-27· cited 8×
- State v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-04-26· cited 4×
- State v. LenorudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.