State v. Wentworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming after finding that the defendant had not preserved the argument that an “incidental and momentary” crossing of the fog line was not a violation of ORS 811.370

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Little
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-06· cited 11×
• State v. Cossette
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-15· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 63×
• State v. Tiffin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 32×
• State v. McBroom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-23· cited 28×
• State v. Isley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-06-12· cited 19×
• State v. Reeves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-06· cited 19×
• State v. Tryon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-06· cited 14×
• State v. VANLOM
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-16· cited 7×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-23· cited 6×
• State v. Roberts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-08-18· cited 2×