Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/6/2011

State v. Tryon

Citations

255 P.3d 498
242 Or. App. 51
2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the admission of a return of service of a restraining order did not violate the defendant’s right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment because a return of service is not testimonial
holding that the admission of a return of service of a restraining order did not violate the defendant's right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment because a return of service is not testimonial
deciding confrontation clause claim under Sixth Amendment without addressing unpreserved state constitutional claim
deciding confrontation clause claim under Sixth Amendment without addressing unpreserved state constitutional claim
reasoning return of service non-testimonial because it was created to serve administrative purpose of informing law enforcement agencies of the restraining order and was not produced at request of law enforcement
court has “obligation to determine sua sponte whether a contention has been preserved for appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted; emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollheim, Brewer, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.