Skip to main content

State v. Wells

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8738

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4), findings, R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)(a). Where state conceded that the trial court did not make the necessary findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) to impose consecutive sentences, sentence reversed and case remanded for trial court to consider whether consecutive sentences are appropriate under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and, if so, to make the required findings on the record and incorporate those findings in the sentencing journal entry. Sentence not modified to concurrent sentences as requested by appellant because appellate court can modify a sentence under R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)(a) only if the findings made by the trial court do not support consecutive sentences, and trial court made no findings.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.