State v. Wells

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘To the extent that the defendant also claims that the five year sentence imposed by the court was excessive, we deem such argument to be misplaced. An appeal following a revocation proceeding is not the proper forum in which to challenge the length of such sentence.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Benjamin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-12-14· cited 14×
• State v. Benjamin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-05-05· cited 2×
• State v. Jackson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-06-30· cited 2×
• State v. Francis
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-10-15· cited 1×
• State v. Skyes
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-05-27

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Alford
  Supreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
• State v. Fagan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 122×
• Fagan v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 108×
• State v. Preston
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 54×
• State v. Singleton
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-12· cited 47×
• State v. T.D.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 47×
• State v. TD
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-08· cited 46×
• State v. Boyle
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 24×
• State v. Quinones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-22· cited 15×
• State v. Wells
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-11-04· cited 14×
• State v. Widlak
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-31· cited 12×
• State v. Payne
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-04-26· cited 9×
• Joyner v. Simkins Industries, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-11-04· cited 8×
• State v. THEOFERLIUS D.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-10· cited 7×