Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/1/2008
State v. Boyle
Citations
- 949 A.2d 460
- 287 Conn. 478
- 2008 Conn. LEXIS 248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an intermediate appellate court opinion should be vacated because the ease was moot and the strict statutory construction in the opinion could be prejudicial to the state in future cases
- because defendant may face probationary period that varies from few months to thirty-five years, probationary periods not of limited duration
- examination undertaken of statutes governing probationary periods in determining if action or effects not of inherently limited duration
- appeal is moot, and therefore must be dismissed, when, because of intervening events during pendency of appeal, appellate court cannot afford appellant any practical relief
- appeal is moot, and therefore must be dis- missed, when, because of events occurring during pen- dency of appeal, appellate court cannot afford any practical relief to appellant
- ‘‘[t]he appeal is dismissed and the judgment of the Appellate Court is vacated’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Schaller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-20· cited 78×
- State v. BarclayIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-04-23· cited 69×
- Patterson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-03· cited 9×
- State v. WellsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-01-20· cited 6×
- In Re Earl B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-18· cited 5×
- American Tax Funding, LLC v. Design Land Developers of Newtown, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-20· cited 4×
- Thornton v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-07-02· cited 4×
- State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-08-21· cited 4×
- State v. GodboutConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-11-19· cited 3×
- CT Freedom Alliance, LLC v. Dept. of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-01-12· cited 3×
- Savin Gasoline Properties, LLC v. Commission on the City PlanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-11-02· cited 2×
- State v. JumppConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-02-14· cited 1×
- In re Emma F.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-02-03
- Wendy v. v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-11-10
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-10-25
- Henning v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-06-14
- Birch v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-06-14
- Buie v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-03-16
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.